<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving compile times with runtime css</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/</link>
	<description>Axel Jensen on Flex, Coldfusion and... other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: oyunlar</title>
		<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>oyunlar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelscript.com/?p=170#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>This is sweet. Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sweet. Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oyun</title>
		<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>oyun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelscript.com/?p=170#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>thanks, it would probably be unnecessary to do this without fonts, fonts almost cause an immediate issue with compiling. Where it’s fairly easy just to use photoshop’s “save for web” feature and you can get a 30 - 40k image file down to 3k or 4k…

so I really would only recommend this if you have a lot of fonts or any for that matter, because of how immediate their effect is on compile times… seems that every font you embed adds a second or two to the compile times…

anyway, it does take a lot of images to slow down compile times, or at least quite a few decent sized ones… there are ways to separate images into another project using a Flex Library Project, but i’ll probably write about how to include images into the same separated project. I have to do some testing to see if it will work the way I think though.

Thanks for reading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, it would probably be unnecessary to do this without fonts, fonts almost cause an immediate issue with compiling. Where it’s fairly easy just to use photoshop’s “save for web” feature and you can get a 30 - 40k image file down to 3k or 4k…</p>
<p>so I really would only recommend this if you have a lot of fonts or any for that matter, because of how immediate their effect is on compile times… seems that every font you embed adds a second or two to the compile times…</p>
<p>anyway, it does take a lot of images to slow down compile times, or at least quite a few decent sized ones… there are ways to separate images into another project using a Flex Library Project, but i’ll probably write about how to include images into the same separated project. I have to do some testing to see if it will work the way I think though.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reynacho</title>
		<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>reynacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelscript.com/?p=170#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>This is sweet.  Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sweet.  Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelscript.com/?p=170#comment-999</guid>
		<description>thanks, it would probably be unnecessary to do this without fonts, fonts almost cause an immediate issue with compiling.  Where it's fairly easy just to use photoshop's "save for web" feature and you can get a 30 - 40k image file down to 3k or 4k... 

so I really would only recommend this if you have a lot of fonts or any for that matter, because of how immediate their effect is on compile times... seems that every font you embed adds a second or two to the compile times... 

anyway, it does take a lot of images to slow down compile times, or at least quite a few decent sized ones... there are ways to separate images into another project using a Flex Library Project, but i'll probably write about how to include images into the same separated project. I have to do some testing to see if it will work the way I think though.

Thanks for reading

Axel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, it would probably be unnecessary to do this without fonts, fonts almost cause an immediate issue with compiling.  Where it&#8217;s fairly easy just to use photoshop&#8217;s &#8220;save for web&#8221; feature and you can get a 30 - 40k image file down to 3k or 4k&#8230; </p>
<p>so I really would only recommend this if you have a lot of fonts or any for that matter, because of how immediate their effect is on compile times&#8230; seems that every font you embed adds a second or two to the compile times&#8230; </p>
<p>anyway, it does take a lot of images to slow down compile times, or at least quite a few decent sized ones&#8230; there are ways to separate images into another project using a Flex Library Project, but i&#8217;ll probably write about how to include images into the same separated project. I have to do some testing to see if it will work the way I think though.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading</p>
<p>Axel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polyGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.axelscript.com/2008/10/03/improving-compile-times-with-runtime-css/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>polyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelscript.com/?p=170#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Very nice. I'll use this technique the next time I have an asset intensive project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. I&#8217;ll use this technique the next time I have an asset intensive project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
